2/2/1996Â
One of the more interesting interviews you’ll read…and an interview that directly affects your livelihood is in this issue of Network 40. Pierre Bouvard, General Manager of Arbitron, gives his thoughts and answers questions that can help you do your job better. A PD or MD can learn how to best program a radio station to achieve accurate ratings through the Arbitron methodology. A promotion person can better understand a programmer’s needs in relation to the dreaded “ratings.â€Â As a programmer, I have felt the sting of Arbitron’s methodology. That bad boy bites!
Mr. Bouvard makes some interesting points in his interview. Whether you agree or disagree with some of his positions, one thing is certain: Since his appointment as GM of the company, Arbitron has seemed to be more attentive to the needs of radio. Many radio executives many question the end result of their discussions with Arbitron, but none can say that Arbitron doesn’t give radio a fair hearing.
Mr. Bouvard points out that bad radio makes for bad ratings. An oversimplification, to say the least, but somewhat true, nonetheless. If you have a radio station that is programmed correctly and aggressively, you’ll have more good books than bad. However, Mr. Bouvard is fooling himself if he believes that just programming a successful radio station will generate a substantial gain in a ratings books.
Although Arbitron methodology shouldn’t be the primary focus in adding records, planning promotions and setting up format clocks, you certainly must take that methodology into consideration. Programming “across the quarter-hours†may be an old wives’ tale to Mr. Bouvard, but as a piece of the pie. It always seemed to work.
A good PD will program a radio station to the audience through the methodology or Arbitron.
Why? Why not?
It certainly doesn’t hurt and, if only as a further attention to detail, it can and does help.
If you are going to be judged, not by how your station sounds but how well you do in the books of Arbitron, you have to play by those rules. Arbitron uses certain techniques to get listeners to respond to a survey. Make sure you’re aware of those techniques and use them yourself.Â
Since Arbitron uses a recall method, it is extremely important that you ingrain in your listeners the “favorite†flavor. By constant repetition, your listeners should be convinced that your station is their favorite. It can’t be stated enough.
Contests and promotions should always have something similar to, What’s your favorite station?†as an integral part. Force your listeners to identify your call letters as their favorite station. Perceptions is reality. Fool around all you want to with “The #1 Hit Music Station,†“Your Concert Connection,†or other slug-lines, but in recall methodology, the answer to “What’s your favorite radio station?†is going to win every time.
Since Arbitron asks participants to write down their listening habits, you should use this same methodology in contests. On-going promotions that force your audience to listen over a period of time (like Cash Call, High-low, etc.) should be reinforced with the slogan, “Write it down.â€
This is not to say that every contest you air should be tagged with that phrase, but having your listeners…and particularly the contest pigs and others who participate regularly in promotions…reinforced with the suggestions to “write it down†can only be a benefit. Those who don’t play contests won’t be offended and those who do will be reminded. If a diary falls into one of these households, you’re sure to benefit.
Any promotions that increase specific listening (such as those mentioned above) must be a consistent part of your promotional campaign. Too often, we become “too hip for the room.â€Â It’s fine to be hip, but promotions should be aimed at the least common denominator. The hip and cool people probably won’t participate in an Arbitron survey; they’re too busy. It’s those nerds who have no life other than their radio that will make your ratings go up.
Mr. Bouvard makes a very interesting supposition in the interview when he says that people don’t recall exactly what times they listen. Even the GM of Arbitron admits that the results are a basically a “guesstimate.â€Â So Arbitron isn’t exactly accurate?
Hold the presses. We’ve got a news flash!
There is no doubt that Arbitron’s methodology in determining ratings is suspect at best and a cruel joke at worst. Radio has known his forever. We have criticized Arbitron for their methodology, techniques, samples and returns since the first bad book. However, the joke is on us.
Why? Because radio hasn’t come up with a viable, economical alternative.
We’ve had some experiments with alternative ratings. Direct phone calls are infinitely more accurate in determining at-home listening. When you call and ask someone, “What station are you listening to right now?†you’ll usually get an accurate answer. But when a respondent is questioned about previous listening habits, we’re back to the same old horse…just a different color. And there’s no way to get an accurate account of those listening at work (who’s going to risk the wrath of their boss to participate in a radio survey at work?) or in automobiles.
People meters are the next step. These “beepers†fit on a respondent’s belt or inside a purse and measure the frequencies each person is exposed to over a given day. These would be extremely accurate, but also extremely expensive. Will radio pick up the additional tab for a supposedly more accurate survey? Radio already questions the amount charged by Arbitron.
So what’s a mother do to? Get into TV, where the entire nationwide audience of over 200 million people is determined by 200 households?
Face it: Radio programmers are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Your future is often determined by an inadequate system that is often inaccurate. Most GMs discount the importance of Arbitron…until the book comes out.
You can work hard, spend hours on music computers, research and contests. You can wear yourself out by programming through Arbitron’s methodology and still get killed by a bad drop.
Good thing there’s another avenue available for your consideration.