4/4/1997
Several weeks ago, I wrote an Editorial that was highly critical of the Monitor. Actually, the Editorial was critical of the policies of the Monitor… and the people of the Monitor who made the policies…specifically Howard Lander, Sean Ross, Kevin Carter and Theda Sandiford. I said it would be harder to find anyone dumber than the Gang of Four. I was speaking of their overall intelligence. I assume each of these individuals are smart in their own way. They’re just stupid when it comes to the radio or record business…despite the fact that they are in charge of a magazine that purports to support that very industry.
I owe the Gang an apology. I know it’s not like me, but when I’m right (which is most of the time), I take the credit. And when I’m wrong (which is almost never…ask anyone who works for me), I will take the blame. I said it would be hard to find anyone dumber than the Gang of Four. I was wrong. After reading last week’s Monitor, I found someone.
Sean Ross.
The fact that he is a member of the Gang notwithstanding, Sean has separated himself from his peers with a column that begs to wonder if Mr. Ross is indeed on a spaceship circling the Hale-Bopp comet. It proves he is totally out of touch with the realities of the radio and record industries.
Sean writes, under the the heading “Top 40 Topics†(golly gee, what a nifty name), about “Going For Adds Or Going For The Real Story.â€Â Mr. Ross wonders why companies still “go for adds†and schedule “add dates.â€Â If he has to wonder, Mr. Ross should wake up and smell the coffee. However, I feel the mere smell of coffee certainly couldn’t pull him out of his evident coma.
Ah, what a warm-and-fuzzy world we would live in if there was no emphasis on stations “adding†a record.  There would be no more scheduling meetings because record companies could release everything on the same day. Warner Bros. could gather up all their artists and ask, “Who wants to release an album next year? Just deliver it by January 1, because that’s when we release everything.
“We’re not concerned with adds anymore, so let’s just throw all the product out there at the same time. Maybe some programmer will listen to it and play it.â€
Wow, wouldn’t that be cool?
Actually, it might make it easier if every record company released all their records on the same day. Then we could get it all over with in a hurry. Oh, some artists would get lost and some hit records would never get heard, but that’s okay. Shit happens.
How would we gauge a record’s early success? We couldn’t. But, who cares? We aren’t in the business of promotion, we’re in the business of reality. Unfortunately, what Sean doesn’t seem to understand is that reality is almost always a byproduct of promotion.
We have a Bill of Rights because a bunch of promotion people got it “added†to the Constitution. We are able to break new acts because programmers commit to the music by “adding†the record. Anyone who believes records “just organically happen†without a solid promotion and marketing plan should put a purple scarf over their head and become a part of Hale-Bopp.
Maybe a superstar act doesn’t need a group of early believers to ensure a hit—although most would even argue this point. But certainly newer, unproven artists need early believers to shout the gospel by “adding†the record.
It is a fact of life that PDs look to others for guidance. How many adds a record gets often decides a records’ fate. Some may say it isn’t fair (usually those who didn’t get any adds), but the fact is that the system works.
Programmers depend on promotion people and information. If a record gets added on 100 stations, it’s worth a listen. And the reverse is certainly true. If a record gets only two adds…maybe it isn’t worth a listen.
Add dates are all-important in the internal set-up of a record. Scheduling is king. No one wants to release a superstar act the same time as another label’s superstar. Nor does any company want to release a new artist if several superstars are coming with releases in a given month. Companies want to schedule add dates with touring when possible, making tickets, artist meetings and other promotional activities possible. Add dates are coordinated to make sure product is in stores.
All of these reasons would seem obvious to even the most ignorant in our business. So what does this say about Sean and the publication for which writes? Does Monitor not know…or simply not care?
Sean checked out the adds in his own magazine and found only a “few†that mention “add dates.â€Â Maybe it’s because adds aren’t important to Monitor’s readers. Monitor prints information that has already happened. Promotion people and PDs are concerned with more than history…they must know what’s next… what records are coming…who’s going to “add†them…who has passion for them. You’ll find no passion in the Monitor.
You will find people with no experience or knowledge of our business trying to dictate formats and questioning record company practices designed to break new acts and records that make history.
The Monitor should hurry up and hire Tony Novia. They need someone—even with his limited radio ability. (Just kidding, Matty.)
In short, Sean Ross sucks, the Monitor blows, Network 40 rules.
I know I think I know everything. But consider the other trade geeks and you have a better understanding of the saying, “In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king!â€
Well, give me my eye patch and call me Snake.